Niger Delta Research Digest logo

Niger Delta Research Digest

(NDRD)

A journal of the Institute for Niger Delta Studies (INDS)

Niger Delta University, Nigeria.
Submit Article

OIL COMPANY-COMMUNITY CONFLICTS AND DEVELOPMENT REALITIES IN THE NIGER DELTA: THE BAYELSA STATE EXPERIENCE

Pages 10-34
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17318457
Keywords: community conflict development oil company Bayelsa

Abstract

The conflict-development literature establishes the fact that conflict inhibits growth and development in society. Scholars have argued that conflict is a major cause of poverty and underdevelopment in Africa. Conversely, this research paper showed that conflict has the potential for community development as seen in the oil company-community conflicts in Bayelsa state. This research investigated oil company-community conflicts as it affects development in oil producing communities. The survey research design was used with questionnaire, focus group discussions, interviews and personal observations as instruments for the collection of primary data. Findings showed that oil company-community conflicts promote development in oil producing communities in Bayelsa state. This however, was predicated on certain conditions. The study recommends among others that (1) oil companies should respond promptly to community agitations in order to secure social license to operate as well as ensure community development; (2) communities should elect credible and enlightened individuals to occupy leadership positions.

How to Cite

Harvard Style

Worufah, W.R. (2023), "OIL COMPANY-COMMUNITY CONFLICTS AND DEVELOPMENT REALITIES IN THE NIGER DELTA: THE BAYELSA STATE EXPERIENCE", in Niger Delta Research Digest Vol. 13, No. 1, pp10-34, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17318457.

400 views | 168 downloads
Download PDF

Related Articles

As a literary text, Barclays Ayakoroma’s Castles in the Air suffers a dearth of critical insights and exploration from a linguistic standpoint, which is vital for a comprehensive description and characterization of the text. Using M.A.K. Halliday’s systemic functional model, particularly the textual, ideational and interpersonal metafunctions, the study, therefore, investigates the stylistic value of code-mixing and code-switching in the text, with particular focus on the sociology of language in a bilingual or multilingual text. The study reveals that code mixing and code switching enable interlocutors to be down-to-earth, instantiate bonding and solidarity with particular groups/classes of people, thereby excluding others, capture emotional and psychological states, and impart or emphasize specific messages or moods in given informal discourse situations. The study foregrounds the twin concepts as a cardinal part of the complex Nigerian linguistic and cultural environment which Ayakoroma deploys to nativize and contextualize meaning in the text. It demonstrates the fact that the linguistic choices of a writer are products of sundry social and contextual variables.

Read Abstract →

A CONVERSATION WITH AN AFRICAN LITERARY ICON, GABRIEL OKARA*

Read Abstract →

Environmental justice struggles have remained a dominant feature of civic action and political engagement by oil-impacted communities in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, particularly in their interface with the Nigerian state and oil multinational corporations (IOCs). While most of the confrontations between oil communities, NGOs, and community-based social movements have been informed by nonviolent protests and campaigns, efforts to pursue legal avenues in order to make the Nigerian state and oil corporations accountable have been limited. This is as a result of the weak judicial setting and loopholes in Nigerian environmental torts that make it problematic to bring the state and corporations to justice. This trend changed when, with the support of national and international NGOs, the people of Bodo community in Ogoni sued Shell in a United Kingdom court and got compensated for two massive oil spills that ravaged the community in 2008 and 2009. This paper examines the Bodo oil spills, their environmental impacts, and the resilience of the Bodo people in demanding accountability and environmental justice through litigation. It argues that the payment of monetary compensation is not sufficient for the massive environmental losses suffered by the community in the face of two massive oil spills. Hence, the success of the Bodo oil spill case is not sufficient to claim that justice has been procured for the community. Although real justice may not have been achieved from the Bodo oil spill case, the paper argues that it has nonetheless inspired other communities to pursue their environmental justice claims against Shell in foreign jurisdictions.

Read Abstract →
Skip to main content