Petro-Aggression and Livelihood Challenges of Women Living with Disabilities in the Niger Delta

Pages 85-101
Keywords: Oil Politics; Economic Violence; Women Living with Disabilities; Livelihoods; Niger Delta

Abstract

Oil politics and economic violence present distinct challenges for women living with disabilities, amplifying existing vulnerabilities and creating unique forms of marginalisation in communities impacted by environmental degradation. Anecdotal evidence shows that the attendant consequences of ‘petro-aggression’ in the oil-rich Niger Delta region impacts negatively on the populace, particularly women. From environmental degradation to disrupted traditional livelihoods and its attendant socio-economic and health implications, women suffer multidimensional hardship that impacts their lives adversely. This study aims at investigating the complexities faced by women, especially those living with disabilities, in the Niger Delta, as a way to address the interconnected issues of oil politics, economic violence, and livelihood challenges in the region. The study adopts a cross-sectional qualitative research design involving 45 rural women living with disabilities in three Niger Delta States (namely, Rivers, Delta, and Bayelsa States). Relevant data were gathered through interviews and focus group discussions, and the findings were documented verbatim and presented using narrative analysis. Findings of the study reveal that environmental damages and displacements resulting from oil activities destroy traditional livelihoods relied upon by women with disabilities, deepening poverty and dependence. Furthermore, oil-related violence and instability often disrupt support systems and services specifically designed for people with disabilities, leaving them isolated and without essential support. As such, the study recommends, inter alia, that implementing inclusive development models, advocating for better protection, and promoting access to resources are key steps towards mitigating these challenges and ensuring their rights and well-being.

How to Cite

Harvard Style

Nwakanma, E. (2025), "Petro-Aggression and Livelihood Challenges of Women Living with Disabilities in the Niger Delta", in Niger Delta Research Digest Special Issue No. 3, pp85-101, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17011470.

460 views | 195 downloads

Related Articles

This study examines government efforts to curb oil bunkering in the Kolo Creek axis of Ogbia Local Government Area, Bayelsa State. Driven by poverty, unemployment, and marginalisation, artisanal oil refining has persisted despite severe environmental and security risks. Drawing on the assumptions of the Relative Deprivation Theory, this study examines how perceived economic exclusion fuels resistance to government interventions. A descriptive phenomenological methodology was adopted, employing in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews to collect data from participants in Otuegwe II, Ibelebiri, and Oruma communities. Findings reveal that although military interventions disrupt illegal refining, they also exacerbate human insecurity, deepen economic distress, and upscale community distrust. Participants reported increased violence, displacement, and theft following the cessation of oil bunkering, with some youths turning to palm kernel oil production as an alternative means of livelihood. However, the economic hardship and lack of sustainable opportunities have made the allure of illegal refining enduring. The study recommends a shift from militarised responses to community-driven solutions. Government and stakeholders should prioritise sustainable livelihood programmes, such as agriculture, aquaculture, and value chains for palm kernel oil, to address root causes of poverty and unemployment. Meaningful community engagement and infrastructural development are critical for achieving long-term success in eradicating oil bunkering.

The history of oil extraction in Nigeria cannot be extricated from the sociocultural, economic, and political life of the people of the Niger Delta region, with its attendant multi-dimensional challenges—extreme poverty, environmental degradation, conflict, and cultural change. As a direct response to the vestiges of oil, there seems to be a dramatic change in the nature and character of the ruling class in the region—from orthodox to neo-ruling class. Interestingly, previous studies have focused largely on resource-related inter- and intra-community conflicts, including the quest for self-determination heralded by militancy. However, this study seeks to examine the historical parallels between oil and the dynamics of the ruling class in the region. It argues that the emerging ruling class is both internal and external and largely connected to the control of oil resources. Pertinently, the social actors in the industry, traditional institutions, politics, and civil society are no longer the orthodox, but rather eccentric neo-actors. The study applies the cyclical theory of social change and a qualitative research design as its theoretical and methodological frameworks. This study concludes that members of the neo-ruling class, who now have access to oil wealth and power—just as the previous or orthodox ruling class had control over palm oil and the commercial waterways—are responsible for underdevelopment, as well as the socio-economic and political dynamics driving social inequalities and unrest. It recommends free, fair, and secure elections; the strengthening of socio-cultural values and norms; and the facilitation of equitable wealth redistribution to ensure sustainable development.

Skip to main content