Economic Potentials of the Lower Niger to Riverside Dwellers in Nigeria upto 1997

Pages 93-107
Keywords: Lower Niger economic potentials riverside dwellers transportation services

Abstract

This paper focuses on the economic potentials of riverside dwellers on the Lower Niger River up to 1997. Trade is one of the most important subjects to study in the lives of the peoples of the Lower Niger. This study is significant because the interchange of goods whether as raw materials or manufactured items brought into contact different communities to exchange material, mental and spiritual aspects of life. The basic argument in this paper is that in the pre-colonial and colonial period in Nigeria, trade in the Lower Niger region was a major source of income for the sale of agricultural produce in the domestic market and for export of staple commodity crops. In the pre-colonial period the Nupe, Kupa, Kakanda, Kede, Igbira Koto, Urhobo, Itsekiri, and Ijaw people who were principally professional canoe men became pilots and captains of ships during the colonial period because of their mastery of the Lower Niger. They piloted ships conveying goods and passengers downstream to and from the south from Lokoja on the confluence of the Rivers Niger and Benue, through Agenebode, Idah, Onitsha, Asaba, Warri, Sapele and Burutu on the open sea to earn a living. The study adopts historical methodology using primary and secondary sources.

How to Cite

Harvard Style

Ali, A.D. (2017), "Economic Potentials of the Lower Niger to Riverside Dwellers in Nigeria upto 1997", in Niger Delta Research Digest Vol. 12, No. 2, pp93-107, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17319861.

315 views | 165 downloads

Related Articles

This paper discusses the diplomatic relations between Akwa Ibom and some selected groups in present-day Cross River State. The groups include the Ejagham (including the Qua of Calabar), the Efut, Biase (Umon/Agwagune) Okoyong and Ododop. The areas under study is well watered by numerous waterways particularly the Cross River from which the modern “Cross River State” derives its name and which links the people of these areas together since the pre-colonial era. Over the centuries, the people have engaged in diverse socio-economic activities including long distance trade. Inter-marriages also took place and helped in cementing their relations. Also secret societies particularly ekpe, believed to have originated from the Efut before they dispersed from the Cameroon area was one principal medium of inter-group relations. The paper refutes the orientation of a prominent historian who described the old Cross River State as an “atomistic society perpetually at war with itself”. It notes that even though some conflicts occasionally occurred among the people, particularly in the post-colonial Nigeria, such circumstances were not enough to disrupt the established relations. It concludes that the rich historical antecedent which is often ignored should serve as the guiding light as the people of the region still interact in contemporary period. It adopts a historical analytical methodology.

The Nigeria’s Niger Delta region has since the uprising of Isaac Boro in February 1966 witnessed renewed conflicts. The region, devastated by oil and gas exploitation for over 60 years and the people still prevented from benefiting from the huge revenue, have raised an army from the abandoned youths to disrupt oil and gas facilities, kidnap and hostage taking of oil/gas companies staff. The action is meant to attract positive response from the federal government and multinational oil companies (MNOCs) that are allegedly inducing the conflict. Instead, they (federal government and MNOCs) have resorted to counter-insurgence measures, thereby creating high degree of insecurity and instability in the region and country. The scenario has been compounded by the lack of an appropriate model of peace-building since the Fourth Republic in 1999. Thus, the aim of the paper is to formulate and create public awareness of a modified multi-tract (MMT) model of peace building that would promote good governance to stimulate sustainable development of the region. Accordingly, the study adopted the ‘state-induced violent conflict’ framework propounded by Etekpe (2009b), and applied a combination of ‘participant-observation’ and documentary methods; and found that the ‘MMT’ model is cardinal in promoting security, peace and development (SPD) in the region. The implication of this for public policy is that government has to move away from counter-insurgence and adhoc measures to that of demonstrating political will to engender good governance in the region and country. Thus, the paper recommends that government should implement the UN provision on the Law of the Sea to protect and guarantee the rights of coastal states to sustainable development.

Skip to main content